Azure Container Apps vs. AKS: Choosing the Right Container Platform

Choosing the Right Container Platform

Abiola Akinbade

3/27/20252 min read

Azure Container Apps - A serverless container service that handles infrastructure for you

AKS (Azure Kubernetes Service) - A managed Kubernetes service giving you full control of the orchestration

When to Choose Azure Container Apps

I moved a client's web API from App Service to Container Apps last year. Here's why it worked well:

  • You want simplicity

    • We deployed our first container in minutes

    • No clusters to manage

    • No nodes to worry about

  • Your app fits these patterns

    • Microservices

    • API endpoints

    • Background jobs

    • Event-driven functions

  • You need these built-in features

    • Auto-scaling based on HTTP traffic or events

    • Revision management (blue/green deployments)

    • Split traffic between versions

    • Built-in Dapr support for microservices

  • Your scale needs are moderate

    • Works great for apps with variable load

    • Can scale to zero when not in use (saving money)

    • Handles most SMB workloads well

  • Your budget is limited

    • Pay only for what you use

    • No cost for idle capacity

    • No cluster management overhead

When to Choose AKS

Enterprise clients typically choose AKS. Here's why:

  • You need full control

    • Access to all Kubernetes features

    • Control over node selection and sizing

    • Custom network policies

    • Advanced security controls

  • Your workloads are complex

    • Stateful applications

    • Custom storage requirements

    • Need for specialized hardware (GPU)

    • Complex networking requirements

  • You require specific features

    • Custom schedulers

    • Specific Kubernetes add-ons

    • Windows containers

    • Special resource limits or quotas

  • Your scale needs are large

    • Enterprise-grade scalability

    • Very high throughput requirements

    • Many interconnected services

    • Multi-region deployments

  • Your team has Kubernetes expertise

    • Already using Kubernetes elsewhere

    • Staff comfortable with kubectl

    • CI/CD pipelines built for Kubernetes

Direct Comparison: Key Differences

Management Overhead

Container Apps:

  • Azure manages the infrastructure

  • No nodes to maintain

  • No cluster to upgrade

  • Less control, less to break

AKS:

  • You control cluster settings

  • You handle node pools

  • You manage upgrades

  • More control, more responsibility

Scaling Capabilities

Container Apps:

  • Auto-scales based on HTTP requests

  • Scales to zero (pay nothing when idle)

  • Upper limits on container resources

AKS:

  • Custom scaling with HPA and KEDA

  • Minimum node count (always pay something)

  • Scale limited only by your Azure quota

Developer Experience

Container Apps:

  • Push container images and go

  • Less to learn

  • Managed revisions for versioning

  • Built-in CI/CD with GitHub Actions

AKS:

  • Full Kubernetes API

  • Steeper learning curve

  • More powerful tools

  • Many deployment options

Cost Structure

Container Apps:

  • Pay per second of vCPU and memory

  • No cost when scaled to zero

  • No infrastructure costs

AKS:

  • Pay for VM nodes 24/7

  • Node pools always running

  • Control over VM sizes and costs

Making Your Decision

Ask yourself these questions:

  • Do you need to scale to zero?

  • How much Kubernetes expertise do you have?

  • Do you need advanced networking or security features?

  • What's your budget for infrastructure?

  • How complex are your container workloads?

My Personal Take

When clients ask me to choose, I start with Container Apps by default. I only move to AKS when specific needs push us in that direction.

Container Apps gives you 80% of what most apps need with 20% of the complexity. AKS gives you 100% control with 100% of the complexity.